Living Counter Cultural: Vaccines must be a choice!

Share on facebook
Share on email
Share on whatsapp
Share on pinterest
Share on print

I feel so strongly about you getting the right information before you consent to having this experimental covid vaccine. DO NOT just believe the information out there on main stream media, check it out for yourself.  Here is a reputable article by a group of Drs. Many health professionals agree with these facts and many nurses are refusing to have the covid vaccine.

January 29, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — An extraordinary recent presentation exposing “the serious and life-threatening disinformation campaign” being waged against the American people and the world. Dr. Simone Gold of the American Frontline Doctors (AFLD) has a current medical license as a physician and surgeon, according to California state records.

She discussed the following facts on the Wuhan Virus:

  • safe highly-effective treatments
  • what she calls “experimental biological agents,” otherwise referred to as the COVID-19 vaccines.

Dr. Gold referred listeners to two AFLD websites where they can access a white paper produced by the AFLD physicians that provides thorough explanations and references for her presentation. Gold concluded her presentation with a passionate appeal for everyone to sign and spread a petition against authoritarian movements aimed at coercing individuals into receiving these injections.

 

Highlights of the paper and Dr. Gold’s presentation include the following:

Correct language is ‘critical’: Not COVID-19 ‘vaccines,’ but experimental biological agents

Dr. Gold insists that even the designation of the new products as vaccines is inapprorpriate.

“Definitely you should not be calling this the ‘COVID-19 vaccines,’” she says. “The reason is, whatever you call it, it’s experimental. It’s not been approved as a vaccine. It’s currently in its investigational stage.”

The initial FAQ of the white paper explains, “According to the Food and Drug Administration, ‘An investigational drug can also be called an experimental drug and is being studied to see if your disease or medical condition improves while taking it.’  Pfizer and Moderna and AstraZeneca applications properly identify their new agents as ‘investigational,’ which is normal at this very early stage of development.”

It means you have enrolled yourself in a medical trial

As part of this experimental status, Dr. Gold explained, “If you take the vaccine, you’re being enrolled in a pharmocol vigilance tracking system. It means you have enrolled yourself in a medical trial … most people are not aware that that’s what they’re doing. This pharmocol vigilance tracking system tracks you for (at least) two years, it’s set up by the Department of Defense, it was handed off to Oracle and Google to put the data together. How is it that people want to sign up for this system on an experimental (biological agent)?” she asked.

Thus, the founder of AFLD affirmed these injected treatments are “most properly called experimental biological agents. … We need to call this by its proper name. Never talk about this without the word ‘experimental.’  That’s critical,” she said.

‘Wuhan Virus’ to ‘COVID-19’

In the presentation, Dr. Gold called the massive “disinformation campaign” on these topics “a crime against humanity” and stated, “You must understand the magnitude of the lie in order to understand what they are trying to tell you about these experimental vaccines.”

PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
943,170 have signed the petition.

Greatest disinformation: Hydroxychloroquine

The paper documented in some depth the “most notable” disinformation regarding the pandemic, which “was selling the lie to the American and European people that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an unsafe medication.” They detailed how the lie was advanced by “Scientists,” the “Media & The Elite,” “Big Tech Censorship,” and with “Government Punishment of Doctors.”

As HCQ is “considered one of the safest medications in the world, safer than Motrin or Tylenol,” it has been broadly used outside the west with great success. For example, in response to the virus, both China and India mandated or recommended HCQ for its population early last year, and at least India, “continues to enjoy a death rate a fraction (~10 percent) of the USA even in the most densely populated slums.”

“So in America the death rates are in the 800 range per million,” Dr. Gold explained. “In Africa, Sub-Sahara Africa, the poorest places in the world, no social distancing, no mask, no ICU’s, they have a death rate of one percent of the western nations. One percent!”

“Now I believe it is due to widely available HCQ. I don’t think you can explain it for any other reason,” she said.

The paper provided thorough documentation on  how “(c)ountries where HCQ is widely available, which are typically third world countries that have malaria or citizens who travel to malaria-endemic regions, have 1-10 percent of the death rates of first world nations where HCQ is severely restricted.”

Extremely high survival rate / low infection fatality rate for Wuhan Virus

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

  • COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,
  • COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,
  • COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low:

  • 0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)
  • 20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)
  • 50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)
  • 70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

Further, in the presentation, Dr. Gold emphasized that these very high survival rates reflect cases where people have not received treatment with HCQ, or another “miracle” drug, ivermectin, and thus with such simple, inexpensive treatments, they would be much higher still. Gold referenced the testimony of doctors before a U.S. Senate committee in November who said if such treatments had been available, very high numbers of lives could have been saved.

In the paper, the doctors observed, “It is quite clear that young people are at a statistically insignificant risk of death from COVID-19,” and for most people under 65, “the risk of dying from COVID-19 isn’t much higher than from getting in a car accident driving to work.”

References

https://lifefacts.lifesitenews.com/vaccines/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.