Living Counter Cultural: Let’s Not Repeat History!

Share on facebook
Share on email
Share on whatsapp
Share on pinterest
Share on print

The Nuremberg Code came about as a result of the post-World War II trials, convictions and executions of Nazi doctors who had conducted deadly experiments, without the subjects’ consent, on prisoners of war.

Furthermore, according to Dr. Simone Gold, the founder of AFLDS, understanding that one is receiving an experimental vaccine is necessary to fulfil the requirements of informed consent according to the broadly recognized international norms articulated in the Nuremberg Code of 1947.

The Nuremberg Code came about as a result of the post-World War II trials, convictions and executions of Nazi doctors who had conducted deadly experiments, without the subjects’ consent, on prisoners of war.

The Code’s first and most extensive principle provides the strict conditions for establishing voluntary consent, including that the individual may not be exposed to “any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.” In addition, they must have “sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved.”

This is not informed consent. You don’t even know it’s investigational.

Dr. Gold, a physician and attorney, stated in a recent interview, “I’ve had so many conversations with people that don’t even realize (the vaccine’s) investigational (i.e. experimental) status, so how is that informed consent?” she asked. “They don’t write it anywhere,” and one has to search diligently to find the paperwork confirming the experimental status.

“So that’s the beginning and end of the discussion. This is not informed consent. You don’t even know it’s investigational. And very important investigational meds can never be coerced by federal law,” she affirmed.

 

In Conclusion

In their analysis of these experimental vaccines, America’s FrontlineDoctors (AFLDS) conclude that these biological agents are “not safer” than COVID-19 itself.

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLDS clarified, “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

Reference

In Text by permission

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.